Candy Jack From Private Dealer (DooBr)
Welcome to new reviewer DooBr!! –Tokeahontas
Collectives carrying "Candy Jack":
Recent Sativa Reviews:
Most Discussed
-
Deathstar Hard Sap – Homemade (Mike-420)
-
Silver Haze X Lavender Honeycomb – Homemade (Mike-420)
-
Trainwreck Taffy – Homemade (Mike-420)
-
Loompa Farms Exclusive Underdogg OG Peanut Butter Ear Wax Run by Kushits From Dabliveries (BipolarHighRoller)
-
Jack Herer in Jack Herer Honey Oil From The Green Flash (Flintsfinest)
says:
Yeah i dunno about that outdoor looking stuff being topshelf mane…
id like to see some oil and % back from that and see if yer still willing to rate it A
says:
Nice…but CC is indica.
says:
It's candy Jack though, Drums, not Cotton Candy.
says:
Yes, I know.
says:
I think he was referring to the fact that CC was listed in the genetics, which would then make Candy Jack a hybrid, not a sativa.
says:
damn near every strain is "technically" a hybrid……candy jack is definitely sativa dominant.
i'm impressed you were up and about on this strain, it set me back a pace and the comedown put me to sleep every time lol
says:
Doesn't look very good, sorry to say..! Candy jack here costs 100/half o and it's indoor grown (downtown LA, pricy), I think you're getting ripped off bud :S
Seems leafy and void of trichs. Great strain though.
says:
I don't comment on reviews too often but I had to stop by because Candy Jack is one of my favorites when I can get my hands on it. For me it's like JH with an extra boost of flavor. People may be doubting the quality, but if you liked it Doobr more power to ya.
says:
Looks ok to me for that $.
says:
It's always marked up from the original price
says:
Top Shelf Mids
says:
This Review is Off,the genetic mix up,that Pic doesnt look A,unknown everything,sorry
says:
Can you try that again? No idea what you're trying to say, sorry.
says:
?
says:
Some of you are funny,its maybe not the best stuff to look at ,bag appeal may not be good but how can you tell how good it is if you have not smoked it?I grow indoor and outdoor and the best weed i ever smoked was outdoor ,it was not as pretty as the indoor but smoked alot better.I will be doing a review of my outdoor Kosher kush ,it is not bad to look at, not as nice as my indoor,but it blew everything i grow indoors away,and it tested at 27% thc .Dont judge by looks.
says:
+1
says:
I dont judge by looks… i smoke too much greenhouse/outdoor myself
says:
+1 and +1.
I've smoked plenty of great weed that looks like shit, also nothing beats some A++ buds grown under the sun.
says:
I Grow Only Outdoors In The Tropics,Year Around,so imagen the Sun…,i dont judge the strain,i judge this particular review
says:
This is bottom shelf where I come from. $30/8th at best. But if this is the only thing around in your area, I dont' blame you for grabbing it. $220 is not exactly a horrible price for an OZ either
says:
Sorry but this looks crap and doesnt sound like an A.
says:
Def not a grade. This is a c grade at best. Not quite shwag but not far from it.
says:
You can't grade just by how it smokes a grade a flower looks great smells great and tastes great if one of those factors is off ours not grade a period.
says:
I understand that if i had to pay for weed and did not get to try it first i would go with smell and looks also.I also understand that the review is based. on all factors looks,smell,taste and high.I just think to call something c grade or mids just based on looks is wrong.He said it taste good smokes good and i agree it looks not good,but the most important thing it is how it smokes,unless your selling it.Then looks really matter.
says:
agreed
says:
As I've said, grading is all in the eye-of-the-beholder… this is C grade where? in a dispensary? in California? because it's definitely not called C grade most places in the world. A, as far as I'm concerned, means high quality to YOURSELF in your own opinion. DooBr's opinion was never up for debate as far as I know.. who really gives a fuck how good this weed is in your area? I don't, I can see the pictures with my own eyes. As far as I'm concerned this is an ego issue, "if he really thinks this is A grade then my bud must be A++++ grade and that'd fuck up the entire grading scale" is what I imagine all these fools tell themselves. Keep it to yourselves, you add nothing to the discussion. My 2¢
says:
With that being said, nice review DooBr! served its purpose and provided me with insight on a strain I've never come across myself.
says:
someones outta weed
says:
Lol hahaha come on now
says:
i appreciate your comments… well some of them anyway. i dont really think a sane person could mistake this for mids if they were anywhere near it. like i said it doesnt look all that great but the smell alone could make someone faint. i get an oz. shipped to me from california every month to a month and a half and this is above average compared to what i normally get. usually no matter how notorious the strain is, it comes too dry. this is the first time i have gotten bud this perfectly dried/cured. over the last few months the strains sent to me were: master kush, headband, purple rain, lemon skunk, and "the purps" all of which were still in the dispensary bag. the candy jack easily surpassed all of them in quality. i would say that "the purps" was stronger but i prefer sativa highs so i would still go with the candy jack. this is my first review and i would still stick by the A rating even for california bud. compared to whats normally for sale in my area its an A++, but i would maintain the A rating even for cali. looks can be deceiving.
says:
Even if it's not "A quality" in Cali (which I'm not suggesting) who cares? what does you giving this bud an A have anything to do with anything, really? Me telling you this isn't A bud is like me telling you that I'm used to smoking better weed than you.. shit's elementary. Nobody should have to defend themselves against these fools (although I've fallen into that same trap) – your review taught me about a strain I have never had the opportunity to try so it's served its purpose to somebody here for something other than his inflated ego. Now when people search Candy Jack in Google or whatever, your review may help some people seeking information. And thus, the comments about grading become irrelevant.
says:
ehhh only problem is people are going to see this review and think this is how top shelf candy jack should look…..when in reality theres much better specimens available…
says:
ok good,i wish i had seeds from this shit to Grow Outdoors In a Tropical Mountain 1.500 metters above sea level here